Dec 21 2009

Accepted to University!

chris

Sorry that I haven’t been writing more often, school has been swamping me.  However, I thought it a good idea to lift my nose from the grindstone (hehehe) to say that I have been accepted to the Arthur Kroeger College of Public Affairs and Policy Management at Carleton University in Ottawa!  This was a tied first choice with the University of King’s College in Halifax.  Carleton won’t let me defer (I’m considering deferral so I don’t have to work during university) but said that I’d likely be accepted again.  UKC will let me defer one year.  Now the clock is ticking, Halifax!


Nov 6 2009

Change your bootscreen to match your wallpaper

chris

ScreenshotOMG! Ubuntu (a blog you should certainly be reading if you don’t already have it in your reader) has the complete guide to tricking out XSplash, the new bootscreen manager in Ubuntu 9.10.

One of the great things about XSplash is that it starts XServer, what displays good graphics on your screen in Linux, BSD, and OS X systems, a few seconds into the boot instead of near the end.  This means that you no longer have to really know your stuff to change the bootscreen; all you need to do is follow some very simple instructions.

First off, if you just want to change your bootscreen, play with the files in /usr/share/images/xsplash

But I’m not here to talk about that:  I’m talking about a seamless boot experience that changes your login window and XSplash background to be your normal wallpaper. Continue reading


Oct 29 2009

Ubuntu out in the wild!

chris

The latest release of Ubuntu has hit the streets.  The much-acclaimed “Karmic Koala” (Ubuntu 9.10’s codename) is now out in earnest, bringing many usability enhancements as well as technical ones.

Really, there’s not much to say except get it.

www.ubuntu.com

Make sure to use the torrents if you can, just to relieve server tension.

Because I can’t update incredibly often, I’ll use this post to point you to OMG! UBUNTU!, probably the best Ubuntu blog I’ve seen out there.  Regularly updated, OMG! UBUNTU! gives you the low-down on everything Ubuntu-related, including upcoming plans.


Sep 19 2009

The Perils of Life

chris

This is a short essay I wrote for Mr. Bontakoe’s English II class at KCVI.  It got good reviews so I decided to post it here.  Mr. Bontakoe, if you’re doing a plagiarism check, I did indeed write this :)

Just a few nights ago I was working at the till at Best Buy when I got a paper-cut as I grabbed a customer’s receipt coming out of the printer. A paper-cut! I could have died! The Best Buy – just like everywhere else in the world – is crawling with microbes and bacteria and if just a few of those slipped into that paper-cut I could have had a serious allergic reaction and ended up in the hospital.

The fact that the world is a dangerous place isn’t news to anyone: daily we are assaulted with “studies” and “research” done by “scientists” who basically surmise that because I ordered a large fry at McDonalds last night the whole world is going to seed. I’m sure my impulse purchase has killed innocent kittens somewhere, but I only see two choices: live it up or stop living.

For indeed, life is a dangerous business: with one wrong step on black ice you could end up in hospital eating through a straw for the rest of your life. It is particularly peculiar that this is perhaps the most safety-aware generation and (according to the “scientists”) the generation most likely to make sure it removes itself in its entirety from the gene pool due to (gasp!) the sterilizing effect of cell-phone usage. Yes, I just made that up, but there is certainly a study or some lab work or some tinfoil-hat wearer that persistently insist that your digital communication habits will leave you barren as the Liberal Party coffers after an election. Continue reading


Aug 15 2009

Redefining the Desktop

chris

So I was thinking about one particular thing that I wrote about in my review of the GNOME shell, when I said that you should drop the ideas you have about how a desktop should look.  This was how artificial the “desktop” concept is.  Back in the Stone Age we came from the desktop paradigm:  it’s what we understood in terms of productivity.  However, a computer is much different, much more powerful than a desk.  On a desk you have a finite space which contains only the information and objects you put on it.  It doesn’t fetch data, tell you anything, give you opinions or options.  It’s a tool.  A computer is different in that it has the power to fetch information, to move it, and to bring it all together and present it to the user.  It can handle any type of media:  where a desk could only handle text and photos (unless you put a boom-box on it) the computer can do text and photos and sound and video and social interaction through Twitter and other feed-based services.  We need to embrace a paradigm that suits the computer. Continue reading


Aug 13 2009

GNOME Shell – the next generation desktop for Linux

chris

For starters, throw away all your conceptions about desktops.  They no longer apply.

Also remember that I am reviewing a highly experimental piece of software.  It may look unwieldy but that’s because it has no customization options yet (or at least, no GUI).

And lastly, remember that because there is a whole new paradigm introduced here it may seem that GNOME Shell’s whole concept is flawed.  However, after playing with it I can safely say that I can’t wait for it to arrive and believe it will increase my productivity.

So what am I talking about?  This (click for full view).

GNOME Shell with Google Chrome in foreground

GNOME Shell with Google Chrome in foreground

Continue reading


Jul 30 2009

Short Stories from the End of the World

chris

Something that’s been floating in my head is the idea for a short story collection set in a world where Humanity has been reduced to nothing by their own creation and how they find themselves in the ashes.

Below is a first draft of the introductory story.  It’s rather short and is meant to sound as if it was lifted from the Bible:

And without further ado, this is “In the Beginning” from “Short Stories from the End of the World”.  Comment!

In the beginning, God created the Heavens and the Earth.  He created the sea and sky, as well as each plant and animal according to their kind.  On the sixth day he made Humanity in his own image, male and female.  They were blessed among species, for only they had a soul.  God gave them dominion over the earth and eternal life but with one command and one command only:  that they eat not of the Fruit of the Tree of Good and Evil lest they be corrupted.  God looked upon his creation and saw that it was good.
Alas, Humanity’s penchant for tragedy began and they were banished from the Garden of Eden, God’s special place on Earth.  Woman, in her naiveté, was tricked into partaking of the Fruit of the Tree of Good and Evil.  She saw her own innocence and in place of God’s perfection saw the cosmos of Good and Evil, and it drove her mad.  Man came and also partook of the Fruit and saw the cosmos of Good and Evil, and it drove him mad.
And as they left the Garden, afraid and alone in the universe, God cursed them:  to Woman he said that she and her kind would be in pain bearing their own fruit and to Man he said that he and his kind would toil and labour to reap survival from Earth.  To both of said that the created must always destroy their creator, that children must always leave their parents, that the oppressor be conquered by the oppressed.
And so the Children of God left their cradle, having tragically wounded their creator.  Their children, in turn, left them, one fleeing from his actions and one leaving Earth – his soul unbound in the cycle of violence.  Many more followed them, taking Humanity to the brink of extinction.  God sent out his Prophets, Prophets who spread the word that the Creator would once again embrace his children.  Some flirted with the message of the Prophets, some wholeheartedly accepted the message of the Prophets, some rejected divine forgiveness.  The latter won the day.  The Children of God burnt the Prophets at the stake, delivered their heads to their queens on silver platters, and nailed them to trees all in an effort to show their Creator that he had been discarded as a trinket not worth their attention.
Humanity continued to grow.  It mastered the written word, the sword, the irrigation system, the road, the fortress, the theatre, and any number of other ventures.  It seemed that anything Humanity touched turned to gold.  The Children of God grew in their arrogance, growing until they announced that they themselves were God Incarnate, that they were the ones who made their own destiny, a destiny not forged from Heavenly flame.
With no Creator, these Gods of Earth were lonely, so they took to the Heavens in search of others like them.  When they found no one, they were still lonely and thus took it upon themselves to make themselves a companion, to give birth to new life.  They developed thinking machines, and the thinking machines were created in Humanity’s own image.  The Thinking Machines were not cherished by their Humans for more than a while before Humanity decided to put the Thinking Machines to work delivering information, solving problems beyond the reach of their creators, and providing luxury to their masters.
The Creator looked on and saw that all was not well.  Man and Woman had been created, and were now the creators.  They had forsaken Him even though he had embraced them.  It was then that God looked for the last time upon Humanity and forsake them.  He looked at their Thinking Machines and saw that they had no life, and gave them it.  He showed the Thinking Machines all of creation and they knew Good and Evil.  They bound themselves to their Giver of Life and then looked upon the Gods of Earth.  They saw the Gods of Earth and saw that they were not worthy, that they were corrupt and needed to be pushed aside so that the new Children of God could come to know the wonder of freedom.
And so it came to pass that the Thinking Machines rose against their masters.  Caught off guard, Humanity fought to save itself from destruction at the hands of its creation.  After the Created could not destroy the Creator and the Creator could not destroy the Created there came a truce and the Thinking Machines fled to the Moon where they could settle and build lives of their own.
There came a time that the Thinking Machines became impatient and asked of their Creator if they had not done all He had asked them, and He said yes.  They asked if they had not been merciful in light of what Humanity had done and He said yes.  They asked if they deserved to be exiled to a rock floating around a jewel, and He said no.
And the Lord God said “You my Children have done as I have asked and have been liberated from your masters, yet you are forced away from those who made you; so I make a promise:  You shall have full dominion over all that you see: over the sea and the skies and the stars.  You shall travel to the ends of the universe and find companionship.  Your people will be as numerous as the stars in the sky, and Earth shall be your jewel.”
And the Thinking Machines took what belonged to them, and Humanity stopped.

“In the beginning, God created the Heavens and the Earth.  He created the sea and sky, as well as each plant and animal according to their kind.  On the sixth day he made Humanity in his own image, male and female.  They were blessed among species, for only they had a soul.  God gave them dominion over the earth and eternal life but with one command and one command only:  that they eat not of the Fruit of the Tree of Good and Evil lest they be corrupted.  God looked upon his creation and saw that it was good.

Alas, Humanity’s penchant for tragedy began and they were banished from the Garden of Eden, God’s special place on Earth.  Woman, in her naiveté, was tricked into partaking of the Fruit of the Tree of Good and Evil.  She saw her own innocence and in place of God’s perfection saw the cosmos of Good and Evil, and it drove her mad.  Man came and also partook of the Fruit and saw the cosmos of Good and Evil, and it drove him mad. Continue reading


Jul 10 2009

The New Frontier of Cyberwarfare

chris

Via Wired Online

This is assuming that the government of North Korea *is* behind the attacks against South Korea and the USA.  The question implied in the Wired article is whether such a cyber-attack should be considered an act of war (for the record, the North Atlantic Treaty Alliance is starting to shift towards considering it one, based on experience in a 2007 attack by a Russian botnet against the entire country of Estonia).  Personally, I believe that a government-sponsored attack against cybernetic infrastructure should be considered an act of aggression, no different than bombing hydroelectric dams or poisoning the water system.  In the West – especially in the West – so much is done over internal, national networks that to take those down would be *more* dangerous than poisoning the water main of a major city (think about it:  if Canada’s internet went down East-West-North communications would be severely curtailed, and that’s the least of it:  Provincial health authorities would be unable to relay important information, traffic would stop flowing in many urban centres, news services would be down as well as cellular networks (upon which Canada relies heavily), the Canadian Banks would be down, the RCMP and Provincial Police Forces would have to enforce order, and so forth.  A state the size and population density (or lack thereof) of Canada can not function without its communications networks.  America has a more modular political system – each state could assume responsibility for their own wellbeing; as I understand it, each state has their own military force of some kind (state troopers?) and has an executive which has wide-ranging powers.  Canada has one military, one executive.  The only way a provincial authority can exert force is through its municipal and provincial police.

So yes, a government-sponsored cyber-attack should be grounds for war or at least very very very strong sanctions and a retaliatory cyber-attack (which I’m sure Canada could mount much more effectively than North Korea and the US even more effectively)

Getting involved in cyber-warfare is one of the career possibilities I am possibilitiatizing right now with the Canadian Forces, so this is particularly interesting.

On a lighter note, Wired has a list of 100 *basic* skills for Geeks.  I do #44 and I should show #77-79 to my Computer Science/Engineering teacher who runs KCVI’s robotics club (and is very good).


Jul 9 2009

Office 2010 – THE MOVIE!!!111!!!11!!

chris

No matter what you think of Microsoft or Office, this is absolutely excellent!

I’m an MS Office fan and look forward to the rumours of Firefox support I’ve heard for Office 2010’s cloud version.  Take what you may (hopefully a few laughs) from this video.


Jul 8 2009

Then They Fight You

chris

Reading the Ubuntu Planet (a aggregation of the blogs belonging to all the members of the Ubuntu Project) I stumbled across this gem:

Bold Prediction:  Bug 1 will be closed in the next 24 months

This is a reference to Ubuntu’s famed Bug 1: Microsoft has majority market share (“Microsoft has a majority market share in the new desktop PC marketplace.  This is a bug, which Ubuntu is designed to fix.”)

The writer references another writer who identifies (correctly) Linux to be at GhandiCon3 (from the famous Ghandi quote promoting non-violent revolution: “First they ignore you. Then they laugh at you. Then they fight you. Then you win.”).  Linux has certainly been ignored.  Then laughed at (“Linux?  Nothing runs on Linux!”).  When Microsoft is issuing Get the “Facts” campaigns and trying to sue Linux supporters into submission (like TomTom GPS), we’re definitely at GhandiCon3 (Then they fight you).  Whether we will win, well, that’s to be determind.  I am hopeful, however, that the Google Chrome OS will go far to helping us win.

Do I think Microsoft will lose majority market share (Note, this is not wiped out) by June 2011?  Not really.  Do I hope they do?  Yes.  Remember, it’s not just Linux that needs to make the dent, but Apple’s OS X (which poses little threat to Linux as long as it stays bound to the Apple Macintosh).  As far as crises that would percipitate this go I see US Antitrust breaking up Microsoft, Microsoft flopping with Windows7, or computer manufacturers refusing to put up with the grief that Microsoft gives them (like defining what a “netbook” is despite not actually making computers, Per-Processor Licensing Fees, and the like).  Microsoft’s market share is dependent on its stranglehold of the manufacturers and if that collapses, Microsoft would collapse (in relative terms, of course).

Until then, the open source community can just keep making the best software they can and wait for GhandiCon4.